The opinions expressed inside this story are solely the creator’s and don’t replicate the opinions and beliefs of Search Engine Journal or its associates.
You might have heard about “Ancient Apocalypse”, a sequence wherein host Graham Hancock proposes controversial theories in regards to the origins of historical civilizations.
It spent per week trending within the international prime 10 on Netflix, accruing round 24,620,000 watch hours between November 14th and November twentieth, 2022.
Netflix lends authority to the present by categorizing it as a “docuseries,” and IMDB classifies it as a “documentary” and “history.”
However on-line, it’s been shrouded in controversy, and search algorithms is perhaps rewarding good-faith critiques in regards to the present from scientists and educators – as some working archeologists have deemed the present unsubstantiated pseudoscience at greatest, and harmful misinformation at worst.
The Society For American Archaeology wrote a letter to Netflix asking it to reclassify and contextualize the present, citing the host’s “aggressive rhetoric,” the present’s “false claims,” and the associations that the theories offered have with “racist, white supremacist ideologies.”
However it is a story in regards to the function search engine optimization performs within the controversy – how scientists and science communicators current their critiques of the present, and the way audiences discover them.
Search algorithms get a whole lot of critiques for the way they can be utilized to unfold misinformation.
However on this case, I’ve seen help for educators and scientists who’ve dedicated to pushing again on standard pseudoscience.
Creators Rebutting “Ancient Apocalypse” Get A Enhance From search engine optimization
I first discovered of the controversy from YouTube creator “History With Kayleigh,” who, whereas not a tutorial or accredited archaeologist, creates instructional movies about historical historical past and archaeological websites.
She interacted with Tweets from scientists who had responded and “decided to try and write a fair rebuttal to the show,” as she informed me.
Kayleigh’s video about “Ancient Apocalypse” isn’t the best-performing video on her channel. Nonetheless, it was undoubtedly performing above the typical of her current releases in a brief period of time, at 67,000 views on December 1st.
However then, I took one other screenshot of the channel after the weekend, on December fifth.
Kayleigh launched a second video, and the primary “Ancient Apocalypse: Fact Or Fiction?” had already grown to 104,000 views.

Kayleigh wasn’t the one creator to publish content material in regards to the Netflix sequence.
Dr. Invoice Farley, an archaeologist and affiliate professor at Southern Connecticut State College who runs a small YouTube channel about archaeology in his free time, made one of many earliest YouTube movies critiquing Hancock and the show.
And whereas his attain is far smaller, his movies about “Ancient Apocalypse” exploded.


Dr. Farley shared screenshots of his YouTube analytics, demonstrating that his first video about Graham Hancock drew extra site visitors than common from Google searches.
The under screenshots are from November twenty second, when the video was nonetheless round 5,000 views.
For that specific video, the “external” site visitors supply was round 28%, in comparison with his channel common of round 10%. A 3rd of that exterior site visitors was from Google.


The next screenshot is the general channel knowledge for comparability.

He additionally shared the search phrases the video was performing greatest for inside YouTube search.

I checked in once more together with his channel on December fifth.

This primary video nonetheless positive aspects most of its site visitors from search phrases. Exterior views on it have been about 11% decrease on December fifth than they have been on November twenty second.
This is sensible with publications choosing up the story and filling up search engine outcomes pages (SERPs).

The second video has wildly completely different statistics, being pushed largely by YouTube’s browse options like beneficial movies.

This time, YouTube appears to have acknowledged the curiosity in a trending matter and pushed the video accordingly.
Within the first video that he made about “Ancient Archaeology,” Dr. Farley addressed Hancock instantly with a critique specializing in the connection between the theories posed within the present, and white supremacy.
Within the second video, Dr. Farley centered on debunking the particular falsehoods within the present.
He informed me, “There’s a MARKED distinction within the reactions to the 2 movies. In video #1, I point out white supremacy and the historical past of Atlantean myths with racism. That video has … a whole lot of disparaging feedback [that] are misogynistic, racist, and homophobic.
The second video additionally has some feedback like this, however many extra constructive feedback or constructive criticisms. This video simply spoke on to among the falsehoods within the present however doesn’t instantly handle racism or white supremacy.”
Even with the unfavorable response, the very fact stays that folks watched and engaged with the video, as this screenshot of the video’s engagement statistics exhibits.

One may argue that it is a fluke – and that these seemingly profitable efficiency metrics are merely about capitalizing on a trending key phrase.
However YouTube algorithms work otherwise from Google Search.
YouTube makes use of metadata about movies to estimate relevance, nevertheless it additionally makes use of user engagement signals such as watch time to check the relevance of movies to explicit queries. YouTube’s prime rating issue is viewer satisfaction.
“History with Kayleigh” has a big following already that probably gave her movies a lift. However Dr. Farley doesn’t have a big following, and the attain of his movies comes right down to natural discovery.
Individuals Search For Data About “Ancient Apocalypse” And Uncover Critique
Different scientists, with small and huge followings, have additionally seen unusually excessive site visitors about this matter on different platforms.
Dr. Flint Dibble, an archaeologist at Cardiff College, wrote a rebuttal for The Conversation and famous the recognition of the piece on Twitter:

I reached out to Dr. Dibble for his perspective. He said: “I’ve gotten a variety of responses to my thread. Loads of abuse, and loads of reward. A number of individuals clearly discovered it whereas looking out for more information on the present.
Some, particularly throughout the first week of launch, talked about they have been looking out Twitter to seek out reactions to it both earlier than watching or mid-watch.
The individuals who talked about discovering the thread by a search have been all glad for rapidly getting a clearer context for the present.”
He shared an instance of a Twitter consumer who went on the lookout for details about the present whereas they have been watching it and appreciated the critique he posted on the platform:

Dr. Andre Costopoulos, an archaeologist on the College Of Alberta, wrote in regards to the present on his personal WordPress blog and shared his weblog analytics with me in late November.
The content material he wrote about “Ancient Apocalypse” grew to become the most effective acting on his web site in a matter of days, with Google Search making up the clear majority of site visitors.

General, this isn’t an enormous quantity of site visitors. What’s attention-grabbing right here is how the content material in regards to the present compares to different content material by this creator, particularly as a result of the positioning is comparatively small.
Dr. Costopoulos believes that scientists can attain audiences hungry for info in the event that they be taught the instruments.
“Scientists can use these tools just as well as our pseudo-alters,” he informed me, “and often to better effect, because we actually have evidence to back up our claims.”
How search engine optimization Can Be Used To Unfold Misinformation
Search algorithms are hotbeds of misinformation.
Dissemination of conspiracies and misinformation has been a scorching matter on many alternative platforms, from YouTube to Facebook.
Google has been reckoning with misinformation and the way greatest to unravel it for years.
Individuals who peddle conspiracy theories and pseudoscience know this. They’re knowledgeable entrepreneurs and storytellers, and so they’re good at search engine optimization.
That may make it far more tough to speak good science than misinformation. Scientists have demanding jobs outdoors of selling and publishing, and their conclusions are sometimes tough to speak successfully.
They’re not educated to do it, and academia is sluggish to adapt to digital traits.
That paves the best way for a conspiracy idea to take off with little greater than story and good advertising and marketing.
Dr. Farley mentioned: “By and huge, I believe teachers don’t know do search engine optimization (I’m simply stumbling round at the hours of darkness myself), and misinformation of us are a lot, a lot higher at it. Teachers, frankly, don’t have the time to be taught these items.
It could be actually cool if our universities would assist… however I’ve discovered the media departments at unis are very old skool. If I introduced this to them, they’d pitch a media assertion to the native newspaper.
Our media division is nice and has nice intentions, however by and huge, they’re early within the recreation on utilizing social media as a media software.”
So now we have a conundrum the place scientists, who aren’t essentially educated in communications and advertising and marketing, face off towards skilled entrepreneurs of concepts. They usually’re doing it with private ardour tasks on prime of their present jobs.
Relating to natural attain, scientists want allies.
Is Critique Of “Ancient Apocalypse” Having An Impression?
The outcomes don’t appear as encouraging whenever you zoom out and check out the SERPs for “Ancient Apocalypse.”
I opened an incognito window in Chrome and made certain my VPN was turned on (United States location), then looked for [ancient apocalypse].
![Screenshot of Google search [ancient apocalypse]](https://cdn.searchenginejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2022-12-01-10-639a5bce38b01-sej.png)
The outcomes listed here are a little bit of a combined bag.
The primary result’s only a hyperlink to the present. That’s to be anticipated.
Instantly under are the video outcomes. The second video outcome seems to help the present. It had round 60,000 views once I took the screenshot. That’s a major quantity of attain in comparison with the examples we checked out above.
The third video outcome has a lot fewer views however critiques the present.
We are able to additionally see, on the data panel, that the critiques from the scientific neighborhood might not be having a widespread influence. Audiences assessment the present nicely.
Beneath the video outcomes, we do see critiques from The Guardian and Slate. Let’s flip over to the information outcomes.
![Screenshot of Google news results for [ancient apocalypse]](https://cdn.searchenginejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2022-12-01-12-639a5c120bdde-sej.png)
These are largely critiques of the present printed on giant media platforms. Journalists are serving to scientists get their message out.
I checked in once more just a few days later, utilizing an incognito visitor Chrome browser with my VPN turned on (United States location). There was an attention-grabbing change within the SERP:
![Screenshot of Google search results for [ancient apocalypse]](https://cdn.searchenginejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2022-12-05-7-639a5c52eaf76-sej.png)
It seems to be like Google picked up on the controversy and the newsworthiness of the search. The video outcomes have been gone, changed by a “Top Stories” search function that seems above the natural outcomes.
So, what’s the takeaway right here?
Archaeologists Noticed A Enhance From search engine optimization With Restricted, However Vital, Impression
Archaeologists did see a lift from search engine optimization on this matter. However we will see from Google outcomes that the present is standard, and the present’s supporters have a whole lot of traction too.
The restricted impact of this collective effort demonstrates the hurdles going through science communicators. The influence of their critique appears to be a drop within the bucket in comparison with hundreds of thousands of people that watched the present.
However we shouldn’t low cost the success of those scientists and educators, both.
They’re constructing communities, offering info for individuals who seek for it, and altering minds. If you look carefully, you possibly can clearly search algorithms rewarding these creators for his or her efforts.
customers do uncover respectable scientific analysis once they look into the sequence. The content material is reaching individuals, and it’s inspiring them to look at the present critically.
That is encouraging information for the general high quality of search.
I believe entrepreneurs may also help right here.
search engine optimization professionals have the data and assets to assist amplify these messages. Maybe we may think about it a bit little bit of search neighborhood service.
Extra assets:
Featured Picture: Elnur/Shutterstock